Doctors' patience wears thin five months after landmark case
Article By: Old Harbour News
The case, which concluded on April 1, 2026, after more than one year of proceedings, over 50 sittings, and the submission of more than 170 pieces of evidence, represents the culmination of a dispute that has festered for over three years. The core of the conflict involves mandatory overtime compensation for doctors, which remains based on a contract that expired in 2021, and the unilateral denial since 2023 by the Ministry of Finance and the Public Service (MOFPS) of an allowance to more than 700 doctors, over 25 per cent of the JMDA's membership.
The legal framework governing industrial disputes in Jamaica, the Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Act (LRIDA), clearly contemplates prompt resolution. Section 12(1) mandates that the Tribunal should make an award within 21 days after a dispute has been referred to it, or as soon as may be practicable. The JMDA is arguing that this principle holds even greater weight for doctors, as health and hospital services are classified as essential services under the LRIDA. Consequently, doctors face significant restrictions on industrial action, with Section 9(5) generally making strikes unlawful unless the Tribunal fails to make an award within the specified period.
"The doctors have demonstrated extraordinary patience and professionalism," stated Dr. Renee Badroe, president of the JMDA, in the press release. "They waited; they followed the process; they continued to serve this country. However, after more than three years of waiting, they are becoming increasingly restive."
A $31 Billion Dispute
The numbers involved are staggering. The JMDA is pushing for an award of $31 billion in back money for overtime, while the government's own calculation is $23 billion. Senior trade unionist Senator Lambert Brown, who represented the JMDA before the IDT, highlighted that the government's own fiscal policy paper proposed retroactivity, questioning the administration's argument that an award would be against the national interest.
The dispute's roots run deep. In March 2023, the JMDA accepted a compensation restructuring deal that transitioned many doctors from fixed-term contracts to permanent posts. It was expected that discussions to finalize the overtime rate would conclude shortly after. Instead, the JMDA has accused the government of "shifting the goalposts" from April 2023 to July 2023, then to May 2024, and to August 2024 .
Essential Service, Critical Strain
The ongoing uncertainty is taking a significant toll. The public health system, already grappling with chronic overcrowding and dangerous understaffing, relies on doctors working mandated overtime to maintain essential services. The JMDA has previously reported that interns are working 24-to-32-hour periods on alternate days, and in some cases up to 56 consecutive hours, leading to reports of motor vehicle accidents and illness from exhaustion.
Dr. Badroe has insisted that overtime is not a choice but a necessity for maintaining the system. "Overtime for the majority of us — it's really for all of us — but depending on staffing, it's mandatory," she previously told RJR News.
A Call to Honour the Rule of Law
In his closing submission to the IDT, Senator Brown urged the panel to respect the sanctity of contracts, arguing that what was being adjudicated was "government badness versus the rule of law". He warned that a failure by the Government to obey the rule of law could lead to a state of lawlessness.
The JMDA has been conducting sensitisation meetings with its members across the country while awaiting the award. These meetings are intended to ensure doctors understand the dispute and the Association's options following the delivery of the award.
For now, the nation waits with the doctors, as the tribunal's silence stretches on, raising critical questions about the effectiveness of the dispute resolution mechanism for those who are legally barred from striking.



